Category: Uncategorized

Burnley v Arsenal – February 02, 2020

 

Proud founder members of the Football League, Burnley Football Club began life as the ‘Burnley Rovers’ rugby club and became Burnley Football Club in 1882. They moved to their Turf Moor home shortly afterwards, at the invitation of the town’s cricket club, which is still uniquely situated next to the stadium.

FA Cup campaigns gave way to organised football in 1888 with the foundation of the Football League – and since then Burnley have claimed every major honour, with the exception of the League Cup.

The first honour was a Second Division title in 1897-98 and the club’s improved fortunes were finally reflected in an FA Cup triumph at The Crystal Palace in 1914, with a 1-0 win against Liverpool coming just months before the outbreak of the Great War.

Following the War, the Clarets continued to make their mark on the domestic game and in the 1920-21 season the team enjoyed a remarkable unbeaten run of 30 league matches as they led the club to an inaugural First Division title, having been runners-up the previous season.

That magnificent league record stood for over 80 years, until being battered by Arsenal in the 2003/04 season.

Burnley has been champions of England twice, in 1920–21 and 1959–60, has won the FA Cup once, in 1914, and has won the Community Shield twice, in 1960 and 1973. The Clarets also reached the 1961 quarter-finals of the European Cup.

Burnley is one of only five teams to have won all four professional divisions of English football, (Divisions 1, 2, 3 and 4) along with Wolverhampton Wanderers, Preston North End, Sheffield United and Portsmouth.

Burnley has a 50/50 EPL home record of – W6, L6, GF16, GA18, and in their last home game they beat Leicester City 2-1.

Burnley Home Results – 2019-20
Against	W	L	GF	GA
Southampton	1		3	0
Liverpool		1	0	3
Norwich	1		2	0
Everton	1		1	0
Chelsea		1	2	4
West Ham	1		3	0
Crystal Palace		1	0	2
Man C.		1	1	4
Newcastle	1		1	0
Man U.		1	0	2
Aston Villa		1	1	2
Leicester	1		2	1
Total	6	6	16	18

Arsenal has not lost to Burnley in the Premier League era and we hold a perfect home record.

Arsenal v Burnley – EPL home game results
		W	D	L	GF	GA
1	06-Mar-10	1			3	1
2	01-Nov-14	1			3	0
3	22-Jan-17	1			2	1
4	06-May-18	1			5	0
5	22-Dec-18	1			3	1
6	17-Aug-19	1			2	1
Total:		6	0	0	18	4

We are unbeaten in our away games at Turf Moor and have only dropped two points in five games. 

Arsenal v Burnley – EPL Away Game Results
		W	D	L	GF	GA
1	16-Dec-09		1		1	1
2	11-Apr-15	1			1	0
3	02-Oct-16	1			1	0
4	26-Nov-17	1			1	0
5	12-May-19	1			3	1
6	02-Feb-20
Total:		4	1	0	7	2

Burnley and Arsenal are tied in the League with both teams sitting at 30 points, their respective managers will have the teams fully revved up and ready to battle for both points and position.

Will Arsenal retain their record of not losing at Turf Moor in the Premier League?

GunnerN5

TotalArsenal’s predicted line-up (assuming Luiz and Auba are now available again):

 

A great, dominant and cool-blooded first half was followed by a less dominant second half, but Arsenal totally deserved the win and are now in the last 16 of the FA. A trip to Portsmouth will follow in February and the Arsenal are on course for a record 14th FA CUP win!

The first half we were that good that it seemed Arsenal were playing a second division team at home at times. That was all down to Arteta’s game plan and instructions. Very, very impressive.

Player Ratings:

Martinez: 6.5 – not that much to do in the first half but quite involved after the break. He tried hard to make up for the lack of height/ aerial power of the defenders but was not very convincing with his one fisted clearances.

Saka: 9 – what can you say? Bukayo has it all and was clearly the man of the match with a superb goal and quality assist. He is so strong, fast, calm and intelligent. Love him.

Big Sok: 7.5 – what a warrior and seemed to enjoy playing next to Mustafi and (when he sat deep-left) Xhaka. He was our leader today.

Mustafi: 7.5 – worked his socks off and his interceptions and reading of the game were good. Also some quality distribution from the back. Shame he got injured; it does not look good I am sorry to say.

Captain Hector: 7.5 – this was a big battle for him and he seemed to have enjoyed himself. The Pepe/Bellerin combo is a work in progress, but at the back Hector put in a good shift. I bet he feels great after coming through the Cherries’ physical onslaught.

Xhaka: 7 – very effective in this hybrid role of half DM/ half LB but a few poor passes for which he was not solely to blame. Battled hard in the end with some good interceptions.

Guendouzi: 8 – possibly his best game in an Arsenal shirt. Played much more with his back towards our goal when helping out defence and his reading of the game and interceptions were good. Guendo also moved the ball forward well and was a  thorn among the Cherries all game long.

Willock: 7 – Strong first half (8) but seemed to struggle with Bournemouth when they upped the tempo and intensity in the second half (6). I wanted him to support Guendouzi and Xhaka more in midfield, but some of his attacking play in and around the hole was very promising. Good to have him back on the pitch.

Martinelli: 7.5 – Good assist for Saka’s roof-of-the-net-screamer and worked very hard both in attack and defence. Marti and Saka – Sakarti – are developing a very fine relationship and this time it is Saka who gets the goal. Martinelli has such a pressence on the pitch and every opponent will suffer by him; that’s a guarantee.

Eddie: 7 – Good first half and finished his chance well. Loved his play and anticipation in the box and general involvement in the game. But just like Willock and Pepe, I felt he eased off too much in the second half.

Pepe: 6.5 – Had his moments and was effective in the first half but I wanted more from him in the second half. He remains a work in progress (and is lucky that Nelson is not fit to play imho).

Ceballos: 6.5 – Helped with taking the game back to the Bournemouth half and a few good interventions in our box. But still looks like a duck out of water on the pitch at times. Really needs more game time but competition is big…

By TotalArsenal.

Arsenal v Bournemouth – January 27, 2020

 

This will be the first time we have met Bournemouth in the FA Cup in fact it will only be the 12^th time we have met them.

Our EPL away record

Bournemouth v Arsenal EPL Away Record
Date	W	D	L	GF	GA	GD
07-Feb-16	1			2	0	2
03-Jan-17		1		3	3	0
14-Jan-18			1	1	2	-1
25-Nov-18	1			2	1	1
26-Dec-19		1		1	1	0
Total	2	2	1	9	7	2

Our Home Record

Arsenal v Bournemouth EPL Home Record
Date	W	D	L	GF	GA	GD
28-Dec-15	1			2	0	2
27-Nov-16	1			3	1	2
09-Sep-17	1			3	0	3
27-Feb-19	1			5	1	4
06-Oct-19	1			1	0	1
Total	5	0	0	14	2	12

 

Arsenal v Bournemouth – League Cup – Home Games
Date	W	D	L	GF	GA	GD
27-Oct-87	1			3	0	3

 

Bournemouth have a home record of W3, D3, L5, GF12, GA18.

 

Manchester City	Lost 1-3
Sheffield United	Draw 1-1
West Ham	Draw 2-2
Everton	Won 3-1
Norwich	Draw 0-0
Wolves	Lost 1-2
Manchester United	Won 1-0
Burnley	Lost 0-1
Liverpool	Lost 0-3
Watford	Lost 0-3
Brighton	Won 3-1

Arsenal has a long and proud record in the FA Cup with 20 Cup Final appearances and a record 13 victories.

Arsenal FA Cup Final Appearances
	Winner	GF	GA	Loser	Year	Venue
1	Cardiff City	0	1	Arsenal	1927	Wembley Stadium
2	Arsenal	2	0	Huddersfield	1930	Wembley Stadium
3	Newcastle	1	2	Arsenal	1932	Wembley Stadium
4	Arsenal	1	0	Sheffield United	1936	Wembley Stadium
5	Arsenal	2	0	Liverpool	1950	Wembley Stadium
6	Newcastle	0	1	Arsenal	1952	Wembley Stadium
7	Arsenal	2	1	Liverpool	1971	Wembley Stadium
8	Leeds	1	0	Arsenal	1972	Wembley Stadium
9	Ipswich	1	0	Arsenal	1978	Wembley Stadium
10	Arsenal	3	2	Manchester United	1979	Wembley Stadium
11	West Ham	1	0	Arsenal	1980	Wembley Stadium
12	Arsenal	2	1	Sheffield Wednesday	1993	Wembley Stadium
13	Arsenal	2	0	Newcastle	1998	Wembley Stadium
14	Liverpool	2	1	Arsenal	2001	Wembley Stadium
15	Arsenal	2	0	Chelsea	2002	Millennium Stadium
16	Arsenal	2	0	Southampton	2003	Millennium Stadium
17	Arsenal*	0	0	Manchester United	2005	Millennium Stadium
18	Arsenal	3	2	Hull City	2014	The New Wembley Stadium
19	Arsenal	4	0	Aston Villa	2015	The New Wembley Stadium
20	Arsenal	2	1	Chelsea	2017	The New Wembley Stadium

The FA Cup Final was first televised on 30 April 1938. The match at Wembley was between Preston North End and Huddersfield. With fewer than 10,000 sets in the country at the time and 93,000 people in attendance, many more people saw the game in the ground than at home. But it started something that is now a major part of television output, fought over by broadcasters and worth millions of pounds to the teams.

The Cup Final was only the second complete football match shown, after the England v Scotland game earlier that month, which was viewed as a test run for the bigger event. The BBC’s outside broadcast unit of two vans relayed the action to Alexandra Palace via an aerial set up between the famous domes of the stadium.

Preston’s team featured the legendary Bill Shankly, but the match was goalless until the final minute of extra time, when George Mutch scored to make Preston the winners. The late goal caused a problem for commentator Thomas Woodrooffe, who rashly said “If there’s a goal scored now, I’ll eat my hat!” Woodrooffe was later held to his word, though his hat was made of cake for the occasion.

Watching football on television has become an essential part of many football fans lives. The FA Cup remains a cornerstone of the BBC’s sport output.

GN5 watched his first FA Cup Final in 1950 on my Uncles 9” black and white TV set that had a large magnifying glass position in front of the screen – it seemed like a good idea but you had to sit directly in front to get a reasonable picture. This year I’ll watch the game in my son’s home theatre, complete with surround sound and projected on to a 120” screen.

I’ve watched 69 FA Cup Finals in all, including 16 of Arsenal’s – with 11 being victories.

In 1980 I was on a work contract in Coeur D’Alene, Idaho and US TV did not cover the FA Cup so I phoned a hotel in Cranbrook B.C. Canada and they confirmed the game was being shown. I booked a room and drove 200 plus miles through the mountains to watch us lose 1- 0 to West Ham – it was a very lonely (yet beautiful) drive back to Idaho the next morning.

Let’s see if we can win number fourteen for Mikel.

GunnerN5

Predicted line-up by TotalArsenal:

I predict a strongest possible starting 11 tonight. After all, Arsenal are the Kings of the FA Cup, we need momentum, Bournemouth away is always hard, the nation will be watching, we just love this competition, etc. 

If Sok is fit enough, expect a CB duo of Holding and Sok. If not we may see Xhaka play in the LCB position of suspended Luiz and Holding move to his much preferred RCB position. If Xhaka is needed in midfield, expect Mustafi to get another chance as CB (if Sok is not fit enough).

I expect a start for hard-working Laca with Pepe, Ozil and Martinelli behind him, but for freshness, and just 60 minutes or so, Arteta could give Eddie a start. In fact, I have a feeling that may well happen, with Laca to come on late to score a glorious winner!

TA.

The importance or non importance of the FA competition is not the issue. Even if it were a mere friendly, which it is far from, Arsenal need a win so as not to jeopardize the good work Arteta is doing. Nobody knows this better than Arteta himself, therefore it is expected that he will field a strong team.

Martinez should start at goal. That’s like a contract signed, sealed, delivered. MA might not want returning Bellerin exposed so soon after the gruelling 10-men heroics of less than a week ago. It will be a decision made easy for him by the fact that Maitland-Niles is a good replacement. Sokratis will be back, likely partnered  by another returning player Holding. Brave and impressive 18 year old Saka might be rested for the Tank. Oh, just learnt the Tank is out, so Saka is in. Come to think of it, at 18 his turnaround maintainable time should be much shorter.

Xhaka usually has the most touches of the ball in the team but somehow at the end of every game the impression is that he has expended the least energy. He must be a jogging. Not so Torreira who uses up every ounce of his energy even before the 90 minutes but somehow is able to dig deep into a special reservoir that leaves him totally exhausted by the final whistle. Arteta might deem it necessary to give him a rest on the bench in place of Guendouzi.

Martinelli starts in spite of the 26 sprints he did against Chelsea, 11 more sprints than any of his mates. Arteta, quick on the uptake already knows Pepe for what he is. An unpolished gem. He knows that not long from now, after forging him in his crucibles, he will be glittering. Pepe is likely to start but feeling the flame of Arteta’s burning eyes fixed on him all of the 90 minutes.

He might rest Ozil and use the opportunity to test out his conviction that Ceballos’ creativity can be very useful in the more forward areas. His playing style is not in any book of tactics and defenders might find that unsettling.

Does Lacazette need a rest? He’s been working his socks off. I don’t think MA would be in the frame to start Nketiah. He’d rather have him come off the bench.

Predicted line up:

Subs: Leno, Bellerin, Mustafi, Torreira, Willock, Ozil, Nketiah.

Eddie Howe the Bournemouth manager has even tougher decisions to battle with. He has eight men out. He is in the relegation dog-fight. He is playing in front of the home crowd. What team will he send out? Something tells me he’d be brave. We must expect a tough Monday night.

COYRRG!!!

By PE

Is it too late to re-sign Ollie Giroud?

Exactly 101 weeks ago, Oliver Giroud, L’Handsome, signed for the Chavs. We got Auba, Dortmund needed a replacement which they got from Chelsea and they wanted Giroud to fill the hole. OG worked well with Eden Hazard and played a pivotal role in the French national team that won the world cup in 2018. The move to the Chavs had worked out for him, even though he would rather have stayed at Arsenal by all accounts.

Wenger convinced him to make the move and Auba has been a success for us in terms of goals, so everybody should be happy, right?

Now he is even being linked with a ‘surprise’ move to the Catalonian gods of Barca to replace the shoulder muncher, who is out till the end of the season.

The point I tried to make for many years is that Giroud was a very important player for us. He had his limitations, just like his fellow world championship winning teammate, the BFG, but boy did he milk his qualities to the full and was he an asset to the team. I am really pleased to see that Ollie is getting the recognition for this from both Gooners and non-Gooners, and finishing his football career at Barcelona would surely be the icing on the club-cake?!

He made others better, more effective players by giving them options and making space for them. Very few attackers were better than him in finding the balance between playing with his back towards goal to enable others time and space with the ball, and yet scoring enough goals himself in the team set-up. Now look at Laca: he is trying hard to play with his back towards goal, for which he does not really have the body mass, but his goals have dried out. It really is an art and an unthankful role to play and OG12 simply excelled in it.

Ollie made Ozil and Sanchez the stars of the show without much appreciation it seems, especially from the Chilean firecracker.

Sanchez scored 8 goals in 20 Arsenal matches in the first half of the 2017-18 season; after that he managed just 5 in 45 games for Manchester United (in 1.5 season). MU did not have an Ozil, but they also did not have a Giroud to make space for him and connect with (although Lukaku could have been such a player, he was not used like that).

Over the last two seasons, Ozil’s assists have dried up. He is still our king of the key pass but very few are leading to goals these days, and it was all quite different when he was working with both Giroud and Alexis.

Many Gooners wanted an improvement on Giroud and they finally thought they got one when Auba signed.

However, we should be concerned about our lack of goals and dependency on Auba. PEA is the superior attacker to Giroud as his personal stats show, but there is more to football than individual goal tallies. Have we become too dependent on Auba? Our goals have dried up this season that is for sure and Auba is our only prolific striker, especially in the PL.

In 5.5 seasons Giroud managed to play a whopping 253 games for us,  46 games on average per season. He scored 105 goals, an average of 19 goals per season. OG was a work horse and his lack of athleticism and raw speed – to which the British football fans are totally addicted – never made him a favourite for all, but boy was he important to the team.

The biggest question to ask is have we actually become better as a team in terms of scoring goals since Giroud left and Auba arrived? GunnerN5 kindly did some statistical analysis for us and it turns out we have gone backwards: in the ‘Giroud era’ Arsenal scored on average 1.87 PL goals per game (in OG’s last two seasons at the home of football it was even higher at 1.99!). In the ‘Auba era’ it is just 1.63 goals per game (with just 1.33 goals per game this season).

Could Ollie return? Should he return to Arsenal for one or two seasons?

It is not inconceivable but looking for a similar type would probably make more sense. Having an attacker who can play with their back to the goal suits Arsenal’s passing game, and it looks like Arteta is very keen on it. We surely need to do something up-front as the goals have dried up this season, and although we are playing much better football under Arteta, it is vital that we start to turn draws into wins by getting our goal per game average back to the 1.9/2 mark.

So, it may not be a stupid move at all to re-sign Ollie for 18 months and I am sure he would jump at the opportunity.

By TotalArsenal.

 

To my view, the game has moved backwards… I don’t mean that in terms of some sort of grand cultural statement, but as a tactical/strategic one…

If I had the heat maps or screen captures (or any diagrams at all…) I could probably illustrate things very simply. Alas, I only have my words (and those, I know, put people to sleep)…

Surely, high back lines have been played since the offside rule came in–GN5, history lesson please–and this must’ve increased with the 3 points for a win rule as better teams pushed further and further forward to compress the field. Now with VAR and computer diagramming (linesman/woman is really just a jobs program, isn’t it?…) teams can compress their opponent, that much further.

This, of course, means that there are many times in a match when a team has the ball and all (or maybe nearly all) of the players are in their own half… Counter attack heaven if the other team hasn’t retreated just a bit… So, coaches like Mourinho and Emery say lure ’em forward and then we’ll spring on the break…

(In reference to 10 men maybe being better than 11 for Arsenal, at least against a “top” opponent, like Chelsea, who maybe thought, “OK, up a goal, at home, time to run up a tally,”maybe it IS true, as what is a bigger lure than that sort of hubris?…)

But where does this leave the traditional creative attacker types, esp. those who play central (where turnovers are most damaging for teams as they try to break on us)?…

They are only going to persist at the top, top teams…and, they’ll need to punctuate their “head’s up” passing play (assist making) with plenty of selfishness and head down/magical individual goals. At Arsenal, we’ve got two very fine players (IMO) in Lacazette and Ozil, who are actually working really (really) hard, but are struggling with Arsenal’s downward trajectory as a club (we’re hardly a “top” team, let alone, “top, top” team).

Traditionalists will say, well then let ’em feck off to where the game is for softies (i.e., the rest of Europe) and ALWAYS complain about their lack of defensive abilities/willingness to risk injury and the like.

And, so, maybe Arsenal *should* get rid of them (and their high salaries, etc.)…

I disagree (of course, which, if you’re still reading this probably comes as no surprise) and I would (continue to) counsel patience. As the group grows in self-belief, and we recover from the negative tactics of the Emer-periment, I think those guys will “come good.” It may not be enough to outscore all the opponents all of the time, but I have some genuine hope…

(…Which, of course, will be the thing that kills me…)

In the meantime, indulging in fantasy ideas for a split second, move AMN to left Back, Saka to #10, Mustafi into DM–at least until we replace the curly boys (see below) and move Xhaka to CB…

We can sell Ozil, Lacazette (and, of course, PEA)… And then buy ourselves a real keeper who can save like Leno AND come off his line and (actually) get to the ball (which, btw, might’ve kept us better than level in BOTH matches against the Chavs…) not to mention (the next, if not the guy himself) Virgil Van Dyke. Personally, I’d also sell on the curly duo (Luiz and Guendouzi) and buy the most awesome deep-sitting mid in the world (names, please_…

The team thus looks like this…

What do you think fellow BKers?!

By 17HT

Chelsea 2 – 2 Arsenal.

10 Gunners win the battle of Stamford Bridge, well at least mentally!

We will analyse this game over the next few days as I have been too busy typing comments with Seventeenho, and a cool, focused head I had not!

Player Ratings:

Leno: 8 – Very present and fought like a lion with some fab saves.

Saka: 7.5 – stood like a man and never looked his age. Tried hard to support the attack but was solid in defence which was his main task (especially after sending off).

Luiz: 4 – you cannot foul as the last man, especially in the box. He should know better.

Mustafi: 5 – dreadful back-pass that led to sending off and goal but, fair is fair, he did not hide and gave everything in the remainder of the game. Well done Arteta for keeping him on the pitch… it took a brave man.

Hector Bellerin: 8 – rusty start but led the team by example and never gave up. Superb goal that means so much to the team.

Xhaka: 8 – superb replacement for Luiz, bringing calm and quality positional awareness, leadership and character to the team. I hope all Arsenal fans will embrace him now.

Torreira: 8.5 – what a warrior. MOTM with Martinelli. Held that midfield on his own at times.

Martinelli: 8.5 – what a warrior. MOTM with Torreira. A superb goal that very few 18 year olds have scored at the highest level! To be so cool after such a run… class.

Ozil: 6 – difficult game for him, especially after we went down to 10 men.

Laca: 7 – worked hard and kept defenders occupied, but I would love to see more anticpation and composure. At times too static when there is space to run into to give the midfielders an option. In short, tons of quantity but not enough quality when it matters.

Pepe: 7.5 – worked well with Hector and was keen and able to burst through the Chavs’ defence, which was vital when we were with just 10 men on the pitch.

Guendouzi: 6 – he is not a defensive midfielder and that is what we needed. But he does not hide and offered something going forward.

By TotalArsenal.

Just one change from the team that drew on Saturday vs Sheffield United, Hector Bellerin coming in at right back for Ainsley Maitland-Niles.

Here are your full line-ups:

Arsenal: Leno, Bellerin, Mustafi, Luiz, Saka, Torreira, Xhaka, Pepe, Ozil, Martinelli, Lacazette. Subs: Ceballos, Maitland-Niles, Holding, Martinez, Willock, Guendouzi, Nketiah.

Chelsea: Arrizabalaga, Azpilicueta, Christensen, Rudiger, Emerson Palmieri, Kante, Jorginho, Kovacic, Hudson-Odoi, Abraham, Willian. Subs: Alonso, Barkley, Pedro, Caballero, Zouma, Mount, Batshuayi.

Referee: Stuart Attwell.

Most Gooners believe that things look and feel better under new manager Arteta, but they also are starting to itch for better results, the 2-nil win over Manchester United on New Years day already feeling rather distant.  This one is against another traditional rival who haven’t been turning in consistent results themselves.  Chelsea are coming off a 1-nil loss at Newcastle, but they were similarly beaten (at home by Southampton, 0-2) before they last played us, just some 24 days ago.  In that one, Arteta’s debut match, Arsenal nursed an early 1-nil lead but succumbed to two late goals to allow Chelsea to sneak the full points.  The effort was strong early, but a tactical substitution by Chelsea manager Frank Lampard plus poor fitness from the Gunners, saw us fade as the game went on.  Has Arsenal improved enough to better that result?

We shall see…but I’d love to hear from other Gooners about how they feel heading towards kick-off.

Consider me excited but also wary of the challenge at hand.  I fear a lot of destructive forces were unleashed during Unai Emery’s time in charge and both team and individual confidence dropped considerably.  We’re only beginning to raise our heads again and I counsel patience.   Today’s match is all the more difficult because our leading goal-scorer Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang serves the 2nd of a 3 match ban for a red card picked up at Crystal Palace.

Once the ball gets rolling, I’ll be trying to describe the action as best I can in the comment section.  Regulars will know that I’ve been unable to watch much Arsenal, so I’d be grateful for others to chime in with their views and thoughts.  Thanks in advance.

This is a tough one, but I sense a new unity in the group.  Let’s get behind those guys.  Few things could beat bringing back the points from South London.

Go on then…

by 17highburyterrace

 

 

OZIL CANNOT DO IT ALONE 

We are now five Premier Legue matches into Arteta’s reign. It has been 6 pts from the five matches. This works out to 27.6 pts in 23 matches. We have played 23 PL games this season and are at 29 pts. In other words in terms of points gathering we are still moving at Emery ’19/20 pace.

Without doubt there have been the ‘new manager’s bounce’ only it hasn’t translated itself in points haul. Five games only is still a small sample size but some of our offensive starts suggest a basic problem. The team does not create enough chances even with dominance of possession.

Arteta has stuck to one system and basically the same group of players in these matches. In my opinion it is commendable. It never pays running from pillar to post. At the same time, because of the unforgiving nature of the competition, revisions when called for have to be arrived at as quickly as possible. Something has to be done about our low chance creation. If I dare point a finger I’d say that OZIL CANNOT DO IT ALONE.

Arteta has been setting up his team with 2 deep positioned double pivot in Xhaka and Torreira. They hardly ever venture forward. Guendouzi is about the same when played. None of them is a ball carrier like Rosicky or Iwobi and non of them does the late box runs of Ramsey. Our front three players, usually Auba, Laca and Pepe, don’t have the skill sets to play the role of full fledged attacking midfielders good at build-up play which the fluidity of games do demand. They are goal scorers albeit with their differences. Their passing stats testify to this fact. For example against Sheffield United their pass success rate was Pepe  78.6%, Lacazette 76.5% and Martinelli for Auba 60%. Auba’s season’s average is 70.8%.

Thus we have these two sets of specialized players, deep positioned and goal scores. In between is Mesut Ozil boy alone. By the way against Sheffield, Ozil led the team in pass success with 88%.

When a team has their three front players with an average pass success rate of 71.7% (against Sheffield) but with the team’s possession stat at an impressive 60.9%  obviously we did not dominate possession in the opponent’s vulnerable areas. That explains our meagre 11 attempts at goal with only 7 of the attempts by the front 3.

It must be said that Arteta has tried to address this issue by pushing his left back forward to increase the team’s creative capability. Against Sheffield the assist came from that arrangement. But is it enough? The stats say we need to create more, particularly from the centre and that can only come at the expense of the labelled goal scorers. Some rejigging of the balance between chance creators and goal scorers needs to be done.

The seasonal average of the pass success rate of our 3 front players (Auba, Laca and Pepe) is 75.3%. By contrast, Man city whose model we are following has an average (Stirling, Aguero, B. Silva) of 83.5%. It’s a huge difference.

Ceballos with a pass success rate of 88.1% in a central player who loves drifting left. That dovetails with the forward positioning of our left back. He is neither 8 nor 10 ( i.e. a bit of both) neither is he a winger. He is so difficult to compartmentalized and that’s a quality that can be cleverly used. In Ceballos Ozil would find a mate.  Reiss Nelson at 85.2 pass success rate is another who can be fitted in to keep Ozil company but not in today’s match as he is out with a muscular injury.

Against Chelsea my preferred line up would be:

I have opted for Martinelli over Laca because creators are complimented by players who understand movements around the box. Martinelli is like CR7. He smells a goal developing like you never saw. Laca, who has never scored an easy goal likes to create his goal. There isn’t that much smart movement from him and that would frustrate the hell out of Ozil.

Bench: Martinez, Bellerin, Mustafi, Kola, Guendouzi, Nelson, Laca.

It would be good if we take home the scalp of Chelsea. They are quite vulnerable. They have lost 8 matches to our 6. Our undoing has been the 11 draws. The gods, VAR and some of these referees have simply not been fair to us. I hope the new moon would bring better luck

COYRRG!!!

By PE.

I only managed to watch the whole game this morning and after knowing the result already it was a pleasant surprise to see how relatively well we played. I think a draw is a fair result given the number of shots on goal by both teams, the Blades strong start AND finish, and our lack of finishing touch when it mattered. We are all obviously craving for a few wins in a row but Arteta is building something special and it will take time before we can beat such solid, no-nonsense teams like Sheffield United without needing dollops of luck.

Arsenal are playing much, much better football in all areas of the pitch and once Arteta can get us to the next level, which may not take too long, we will have our Arsenal back.

Player Ratings:

Leno: 6 – SU are a physical team and pretty good at set-pieces. Leno tried to make up for the lack of aerial power in our defence and it almost cost us when he was nowhere near the ball from a corner (free-kick?) and it was only Xhaka’s instinct to move towards the goal-line that saved us from a sure (earlier) equaliser. The costly Chelsea mistake flashed before my eyes. His distribution was often hasty and we lost possession unnecessarily a few times.

Saka: 9 – incredible performance all over the pitch. MOTM. Sign that boy up for years to come, Arteta. Physically present throughout the game, positionally strong in defence and attack, great creative support in attack, many interceptions and balls won, and he has that ability to skin a defender with the ball comfortably stuck to his foot and then deliver a beautifully measured cross or pass, which is so rare in football. Love this lad – I will go and buy his shirt.

Luiz: 7 – solid and energetic. Positioned well and worked effectively with his full back, Saka. Only criticism is his aerial strength/timing at times.

Mustafi: 6 – at times he looks world class and other times he looks an amateur. Partly at fault for the SU goal as he should have been were Ainsley was – who should have been on the RB position. I still feel he could be more effective in midfield as Lucas Torreira’s replacement. He had a few good quick forward passes and some fine interceptions, but his positional awareness and anticipation of danger, especially in the air, is below par. He made me miss Big Sok yesterday.

Ainsley Maitland-Niles: 7 – half a point deduction for his part in the SU goal (see Mustafi) and another half point deduction for a few misplaced crosses, but he added calm to our defence and made some good interceptions. AMN also worked well with Pepe. He is slowly becoming our automatic choice on the RB position… our new Sagna!

Xhaka: 8 – many will have Torreira as their MOTM and score Granit lower, but if you watch the game again you will see they both were equally good. Both had key interceptions and worked hard to dominate the midfield. Both moved the ball forward well, aided the attack continuously and protected the defence with intelligence as well as hard work. They both need each other to be at their best and Mikel knows it, thank God.

Torreira: 8 – see Xhaka.

Ozil: 6.5 – stayed too central in the first half, making it hard for fellow players to reach him with the ball. In the second half Mesut got much more involved in the passing triangles on both flanks and that made a difference. Seemed to suffer most from Auba’s absence. Final passes were overhit a few times which is not like Mesut at all. Still class of course.

Martinelli: 7.5 – worked so hard and got the (‘Auba’) goal we were hoping for. He is such a natural forward with great positioning and anticipation of where the ball will be in the next two seconds. Plenty of room for improvement of his in-field positional play, but what a gem of an attacker we have got. The Saka-Martinelli combo is one to watch: these boys are top class.

Laca: 7.5 – made the key pre-assist for the goal and could have one or two more of these. Tireless central forward play with his back to the goal, which created space for others to strut their stuff. Pepe and Ozil need to appreciate this more and learn to combine better with him.

Pepe: 6.5 – man of moments and he is slowly getting better but we need more intensity and a better final ball. Pepe also needs to realise ala Martinelli that Laca is working his socks off to leave space behind him to profit from. It will come but I must say that Nelson seems to be a better fit for Arteta-ball at the moment.

By TotalArsenal.